Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to ops 2.10 #4

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

tonyandrewmeyer
Copy link

It'd be great to move this charm to ops 2.x (and if doing so, then 2.10 would be a good target for now).

All the tests pass for me locally when doing this, so I'm not sure what the motivation was behind pinning to 1.x. It could be that there are issues that aren't caught by the tests that mean more needs to be done here. If you need help moving to 2.x, please reach out to @canonical/charm-tech and we'd be happy to help.

@addyess
Copy link
Contributor

addyess commented Mar 27, 2024

@tonyandrewmeyer could you rebase this branch?

I don't think there was any reason why this doesn't use ops 2.x other than major rev pinning to prevent catastrophes of APIs changing.

@tonyandrewmeyer
Copy link
Author

@tonyandrewmeyer could you rebase this branch?

Done (well, it was a merge because I lazily just used the GitHub UI's sync tool, but I assume this would be squashed so it would all work out the same in the end).

@addyess
Copy link
Contributor

addyess commented Dec 6, 2024

#9 will likely incorporate this same change. Thanks for helping us though

@addyess addyess closed this Dec 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants